Problem: there are times when writing a React component that we need to render nested children based on a data source that has been provided to us.

Question: can we apply recursion to make this nested rendering easier, without creating a lot of complexity.

​
Inspecting the data

{
	"list": [
		{
			"id": 1,
			"title": "Hello world",
		},
		{
			"id": 2,
			"title": "Hello world",
			"children": [
				{ "id": 2.1, "title": "Hello smaller world" },
				{ "id": 2.2, "title": "Hello smaller world" },
			]
		}
	]
}

Lets pretend we have this data structure and we want to produce a dynamic <ul> list based on this data structure.

​
List rendering

Looking at the data we might do something like this.

const List = ({ items }) => {
	const renderChildren = (children) => {
		return (
			<ul>
				{children.map((item) => (
					<li key={item.id}>
						{item.title}
					</li>
				))}
			</ul>
		)
	}

	return (
		<ul>
			{items.map((item) => (
				<li key={item.id}>
					{item.title}
					{item.children && renderChildren(item.children)}
				</li>
			))}
		</ul>
	)
}

And this works, but now we get some data that have another level of nested children. Do we create another function to render these children? Well we already have a renderChildren method, so lets just use that instead.

const List = ({ items }) => {
	const renderChildren = (children) => {
		return (
			<ul>
				{children.map((item) => (
					<li key={item.id}>
						{item.title}
						{item.children && renderChildren(item.children)}
					</li>
				))}
			</ul>
		)
	}

	return (
		<ul>
			{items.map((item) => (
				<li key={item.id}>
					{item.title}
					{item.children && renderChildren(item.children)}
				</li>
			))}
		</ul>
	)
}

Boom! And we have recursion. But you might notice that the component return and the renderChildren return is pretty much the same. That is because they are! And we already had a renderChildren method, it was just called List. So why not use it, now we can refine this component even further.

const List = ({ items }) => (
	<ul>
		{items.map((item) => (
			<li key={item.id}>
				{item.title}
				{item.children && <List items={item.children} />}
			</li>
		))}
	</ul>
)

Remember, React components are just functions and as the defintion of recursion says;

Recursion is where a function being defined is applied within its own logic.

We are utilising the List function in the same function that we are using it. This will allow you to infinitely nest children in this list and it will just keep nesting the different lists.

This example does assume that the nested list items follow the same data structure as the root list. This will obviously change depending on the requirements of the project but the benefit of using your React components as the recursive function is pretty powerful.

​
Want something a bit more “advanced”

Here is a bit more of a real-world example. We have some data to render different learning areas that you will find at a school, Math, English etc.

This list has a similar structure to the list above but we have another requirement. We have a top level search input to filter the areas. While rendering, if any item contains a match with this filter it should show. For parent items, if any child items are visible, we should show the parent. Check out a working example.

Lets define the rendering of a single Learning area. The data structure looks like this;

export type LearningAreaProps = {
	label: string;
	children?: { [subject: string]: CheckboxListItem };
};

We will ignore children for now and just get this to render what we are after. We will also add a level prop to component to help us indent the component.

const LearningArea = ({
	label,
	children,
	level = 0
}: LearningAreaProps & { level?: number }) => {
	return (
		<div style={{ paddingLeft: (24 * level) }}>
			<p>{props.label}</p>
		</div>
	)
}

Pretty simple so how do we handle the children? Well first, in the data structure, you’ll notice that these are a object instead of an array. Doesn’t matter, should still be fine.

const LearningArea = ({
	label,
	children,
	level = 0
}: LearningAreaProps & { level?: number }) => {
	return (
		<div style={{ paddingLeft: (24 * level) }}>
			<p>{props.label}</p>
			{children && Object.keys(children).map((key) => (
				<LearningArea {...children[key]} level={level + 1} />
			))}
		</div>
	)
}

Great so now we will need the filter, for the sake of explaining, we will continuely pass down the filter value. We could set up the filter to have been created and stored within Context.

const Listing = ({ data }) => {
	const [filter, setFilter] = useState("")

	return (
		<>
			<input type="text" value={filter} onChange={setFilter} />
			{data.map((item) => <LearningArea {...data} filter={filter} />)}
		</>
	)
}

Great, so our Listing component takes in our data and starts the recursive looping of our learning areas. But now, we have to work on that filtering requirement. Luckily, we will just need to stay within the LearningArea component.

const checkNestedChildrenMatch = (
	list: { [subject: string]: CheckboxListItem },
	matchRegExp: RegExp
) => {
	return Object.keys(list).some((key) => {
		const item = list[key]
		return (
			matchRegExp.test(item.label) ||
			(item.children
				? checkNestedChildrenMatch(item.children, matchRegExp)
				: false)
		)
	})
}

const LearningArea = ({
	label,
	children,
	level = 0,
	filter
}: LearningAreaProps & { level?: number; filter: string }) => {
	const matchRegExp = new RegExp(filter, "gi");

	const selfMatches = matchRegExp.test(label)
	const childrenMatches = children
		? checkNestedChildrenMatch(children, matchRegExp)
		: false
	const shouldShow = selfMatches || childrenMatches

	return (
		<div
			style={{
				paddingLeft: (24 * level),
				display: shouldShow ? 'block' : 'none'
			}}
		>
			<p>{label}</p>
			{children && Object.keys(children).map((key) => (
				<LearningArea
					key={key}
					{...children[key]}
					level={level + 1}
					filter={filter}
				/>
			))}
		</div>
	)
}

And that really should be it. In the sandbox below, switch between <App /> and <DiffApp /> in the index.tsx to see the difference between the two.

We also added in another method called checkNestedChildrenMatch which once again uses recursion to check deeply nested children and ensure that all parents are visible as needed.

Now, this component can be cleaned up. For example, the indented padding can be replaced with styling, as well as the display styling. Other than that, I would say that was a success, and personally, might be a bit easier to read to the code in App.tsx.

​
Read my latest 'paper'

These 'papers' are bigger articles I write on topics around development and how to do it better.

Module Driven Development

Discover the benefits of Module-Driven Development (MDD) in software development. Learn how MDD can improve the efficiency, reliability, and maintainability of large and complex systems. Read the article now to find out how your organization can benefit from MDD.

React - Micro ContextsResponse validation with Yup